Today, the Cincinnati Streetcar Project had its state funding pulled by the Ohio Department of Transportaton TRAC (Transportation Review Advisory Committee) board, an objective board set up in 1997 by the Ohio General Assembly to eliminate the politics from the allocation of transportation funding. For the past 15 years, the board has used a rating scale of 1-100 to separate the best and most important transportation projects from those of lesser value, effect, or improvement to the area, and they allocate funding accordingly. Although the rating scale does not guarantee money, it does clearly outline the expectations of the Board and the state when cities and townships apply for transportation money, typically resulting in the best projects receiving funding. Mayor Mark Mallory felt so strongly about the depoliticization of the allocation of funding that, as a member o the Ohio General Assembly in 1997, he tied his name to the bill.
Today, the TRAC Board pulled previously allocated and recommended funding to the tune of nearly $52 million from the proposed Cincinnati Streetcar Project. Despite the project’s 84/100 rating—the highest rated transportation project in the state for the past two years—now faces a gap between its capital costs and its obtained funding. TRAC cited its own budget shortfall as reason for the recent cuts to previously allocated and recommended funding for transportation projects. Lower rated projects, however, still managed to receive some portion of their original funding, while the Cincinnati Streetcar Project bore the brunt of the cuts.
In response to the media question, “Did John Kasich single-handedly kill the streetcar?” Mayor Mallory responded, “we’ll go back to Cincinnati and reassess, see where we are, but I will say, the only difference between now and December when the money was recommended is a new governor and a new director of transportation.” In the public hearing before the TRAC board, Mallory suggested alternative solutions to removing all of the streetcar’s funding, either through proportional cuts across the board to all transportation projects or making the major cuts to the lower rated projects and moving forward with the project that TRAC rated as the best and most effective. Following the meeting, many asked that if the highest rated projects do not receive the funding from TRAC, while lower rated projects receive funding, what is the point of the rating system? Where is the objectivity?
A contingency of nearly 50 streetcar proponents—including a range of city officials, business owners, executives, students from both Xavier and UC, and other interested citizens—made the journey to Columbus to join Mayor Mallory and Councilmembers Roxanne Qualls and Laure Quinlivan to show their support for the streetcar. The eight speaking spots allowed to streetcar proponents were quickly filled, and each made a unique case about the importance of the streetcar to the city of Cincinnati. A mere four opponents spoke in the ten spots allowed.
Following the TRAC board’s conclusion, opponents voiced their jubililation at the ‘death of the streetcar project’ via social media. However, the streetcar contingency very clearly is not burying this project. Despite opponents’ claims that the streetcar has no support in Cincinnati (though the No on 9 Campaign results suggest otherwise) and that it is a trolley to nowhere (though all 14 studies done on the streetcar demonstrate this is not the case), support for those claims was not shown in Columbus. Streetcar supporters believe in the project and are willing to push further, not only through letters written from the comfort of their homes and online comments, tweets, and messages from their computer, but also in their actions making a trip (and in some cases multiple trips) to Columbus to make sure they are both heard and seen. The funding from the state was pulled today, but the streetcar is far from dead.